Phil Spencer, the head of Xbox, recently defended the Activision Blizzard deal at a key European Union (EU) hearing in Madrid, Spain. The hearing was to discuss the potential antitrust implications of the deal, which would give Activision Blizzard a significant presence in the EU.
The EU’s antitrust investigation into the deal began in May 2019 and has been ongoing since then. The investigation is looking into whether the deal would give Activision Blizzard an unfair advantage over its competitors. The EU has expressed concerns that the deal could potentially lead to higher prices for consumers, as well as a decrease in innovation in the gaming industry.
At the hearing, Spencer defended the deal, arguing that it would not create a monopoly in the EU. He said that the deal would create more competition in the EU and would benefit consumers, as it would create more choice for them. He also argued that the deal would help to create more jobs in the EU and would help to stimulate economic growth in the region.
Spencer also argued that the deal would benefit the industry as a whole, as it would create more opportunities for developers to create innovative and exciting games. He also argued that the deal would help to create a more diverse gaming landscape, as it would allow for more variety in the types of games that are available.
At the hearing, Spencer was joined by representatives from Activision Blizzard, who also defended the deal. They argued that the deal would not create a monopoly in the EU and would instead create more competition. They also argued that the deal would benefit the industry as a whole, as it would create more opportunities for developers to create innovative and exciting games.
The EU is expected to make a decision on the deal in the coming months. It is unclear whether the EU will approve the deal or not. If the EU does approve the deal, it could potentially lead to a significant presence for Activision Blizzard in the EU. This could potentially lead to higher prices for consumers, as well as a decrease in innovation in the gaming industry.
Overall, Phil Spencer’s defense of the Activision Blizzard deal at the EU hearing in Madrid was successful. He argued that the deal would create more competition in the EU and would benefit consumers, as it would create more choice for them. He also argued that the deal would help to create more jobs in the EU and would help to stimulate economic growth in the region. It remains to be seen whether the EU will approve the deal or not, but it is clear that Spencer made a strong case for the deal at the hearing.
Source link
